FORECAST OF ATLANTIC HURRICANE ACTIVITY FOR OCTOBER 2005 AND SEASONAL
UPDATE THROUGH SEPTEMBER
The 2005 Atlantic basin hurricane season has already been one of the most active and is already the most destructive season on record. We project that October will continue the trend of above-average activity that we have witnessed in the preceding four months of the hurricane season.
(as of 3 October 2005)
By William M. Gray1 and Philip J. Klotzbach2
with special
assistance from William Thorson3
This forecast as well as past forecasts and verifications are available via the World Wide Web at http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/Forecasts
Brad Bohlander and Emily Wilmsen, Colorado State University Media
Representatives, (970-491-6432) are available to answer various questions about
this forecast
Department of Atmospheric Science
Email: barb@atmos.colostate.edu
________________________________
1Professor of Atmospheric Science
2Research Associate
3Research Associate
ABSTRACT
Information
obtained through 30 September 2005 shows that we have already experienced a
very active hurricane season in the Atlantic basin. The season has already accumulated 183 NTC4
units which makes it the seventh most active full season since 1950. In an average season, about 80 NTC units
occur before the end of September.
Our
October-only forecast calls for three named storms, two hurricanes, one major
hurricane and NTC activity of 30 which is well above the mean October-only
average value of 18. We expect that by
the time the 2005 hurricane season is over, we will witness seasonal tropical
cyclone activity at near-record levels.
A seasonal verification of all 2005 activity will be issued on Friday,
November 19.
2005
|
Full Season Tropical
Cyclone Parameters and their 1950-2000 Climatology (in parentheses) |
Full Season Adjusted 5 Aug.
2005 Forecast |
Observed Activity Through
September |
Updated October-only
Forecast |
Full Season Adjusted 3
Oct. 2005 Forecast |
|
Named Storms (NS) (9.6) |
20 |
17 |
3 |
20 |
|
Named Storm Days (NSD)
(49.1) |
95 |
85 |
13 |
100 |
|
Hurricanes (H) (5.9) |
10 |
9 |
2 |
11 |
|
Hurricane Days (HD) (24.5) |
55 |
35 |
6 |
40 |
|
Intense Hurricanes (IH)
(2.3) |
6 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
|
Intense Hurricane Days
(IHD) (5.0) |
18 |
11.75 |
1 |
13 |
|
Net Tropical Cyclone
Activity (NTC) (100%) |
235 |
183 |
30 |
215 |
Acknowledgment
We
are grateful to the National Science Foundation (NSF) and Lexington Insurance
Company (a member of the American International Group (AIG)) for providing
partial support for the research necessary to make these forecasts. We also thank the GeoGraphics Laboratory at
Bridgewater State College (MA) for their assistance in developing the
Landfalling Hurricane Probability Webpage (available online at http://www.e-transit.org/hurricane).
The
first author gratefully acknowledges valuable input to his CSU research project
over many years by former graduate students and now colleagues Chris Landsea,
John Knaff and Eric Blake. We also thank
Professors Paul Mielke and Ken Berry of
________________________________
4NTC is a combined measure of the yearly mean of six
indices (NS, NSD, H, HD, IH, IHD) of hurricane activity as a percent deviation
from the 1950-2000 year average.
VERIFICATION OF INDIVIDUAL AUGUST AND
SEPTEMBER MONTHLY FORECASTS
Our forecast and verification of
August-only hurricane activity made in early August – a forecast that verified
remarkably well
|
Tropical Cyclone
Parameters and 1950-2000 August Average (in parentheses) |
August 2005 Statistical
Forecast |
Adjusted August 2005
Forecast |
August 2005 Verification |
|
Named Storms (NS) (2.8) |
3.2 |
5 |
5 |
|
Named Storm Days (NSD) (11.8) |
12.1 |
20 |
21 |
|
Hurricanes (H) (1.6) |
1.3 |
3 |
2 |
|
Hurricane Days (HD) (5.7) |
6.7 |
10 |
7 |
|
Intense Hurricanes (IH) (0.6) |
0.9 |
1 |
1 |
|
Intense Hurricane Days (IHD)
(1.2) |
2.8 |
3 |
2.5 |
|
Net Tropical Cyclone
Activity (NTC) (26%) |
33.7 |
50 |
42 |
Our forecast and verification of
September-only hurricane activity made in early September – another successful
forecast
|
Tropical Cyclone
Parameters and 1950-2000 September Average (in parentheses) |
September 2005 Statistical
Forecast |
Adjusted September 2005
Forecast |
September 2005
Verification |
|
Named Storms (NS) (3.4) |
2.7 |
5 |
5 |
|
Named Storm Days (NSD) (21.7) |
17.4 |
31 |
36 |
|
Hurricanes (H) (2.4) |
3.0 |
4 |
5 |
|
Hurricane Days (HD) (12.3) |
9.4 |
22 |
18 |
|
Intense Hurricanes (IH) (1.3) |
1.7 |
2 |
2 |
|
Intense Hurricane Days
(IHD) (3.0) |
0.0 |
6 |
3.5 |
|
Net Tropical Cyclone
Activity (NTC) (48%) |
54 |
80 |
73 |
1
2005
As of the end of September, 2005 has
had seventeen named storms, nine hurricanes and five major hurricanes. Three major hurricanes have made
Table 1: Observed 2005 tropical cyclone activity through September.
|
Highest Category |
Name |
Dates |
Peak Sustained Winds
(kts)/lowest SLP (mb) |
NSD |
HD |
IHD |
NTC |
|
TS |
Arlene |
June 9-11 |
60 kt/989 mb |
2.50 |
|
|
2.6 |
|
TS |
Bret |
June 29-29 |
35 kt/1002 mb |
0.50 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
TS |
Cindy |
July 5-6 |
60 kt/992 mb |
1.25 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
IH-4 |
Dennis |
July 5-11 |
130 kt/930 mb |
5.75 |
4.00 |
2.00 |
23.1 |
|
IH-4 |
Emily |
July 12-21 |
135 kt/929 mb |
9.25 |
6.75 |
3.75 |
32.0 |
|
TS |
|
July 22-29 |
60 kt/997 mb |
8.00 |
|
|
4.5 |
|
TS |
Gert |
July 24-25 |
40 kt/1005 mb |
1.00 |
|
|
2.1 |
|
TS |
|
Aug. 3-8 |
55 kt/994 mb |
5.50 |
|
|
3.6 |
|
H-2 |
Irene |
Aug. 7-8, Aug. 11-18 |
85 kt/975 mb |
8.75 |
2.75 |
|
9.4 |
|
TS |
Jose |
Aug. 22-23 |
45 kt/1001 mb |
0.50 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
IH-5 |
Katrina |
Aug. 24-30 |
150 kt/902 mb |
6.00 |
4.25 |
2.50 |
25.1 |
|
TS |
Lee |
Aug. 31-31 |
35 kt/1007 mb |
0.25 |
|
|
1.8 |
|
IH-3 |
Maria |
Sep. 2-10 |
100 kt/960 mb |
7.75 |
4.25 |
0.25 |
18.2 |
|
H-1 |
Nate |
Sep. 6-10 |
80 kt/979 mb |
4.75 |
2.00 |
|
7.5 |
|
H-1 |
Ophelia |
Sep. 7-18 |
80 kt/979 mb |
11.00 |
5.25 |
|
11.9 |
|
H-1 |
Philippe |
Sep. 18-23 |
70 kt/985 mb |
5.75 |
1.75 |
|
7.7 |
|
IH-5 |
Rita |
Sep. 18-24 |
150 kt/897 mb |
6.25 |
4.25 |
3.25 |
27.7 |
|
Totals |
17 |
|
|
84.75 |
35.25 |
11.75 |
183.1 |
1.1
2005
Figure 2 displays the
Tropical Storm Arlene made
landfall just west of
Tropical Storm Cindy made landfall near Grand Isle, LA as a strong tropical storm with maximum sustained winds at landfall estimated at 70 miles per hour. Three individuals’ deaths were attributed to Cindy. No damage estimates are available at this time.

Figure 1: 2005 Atlantic basin tropical cyclone tracks through September.

Figure 2: Tropical cyclones making
Hurricane Dennis made
landfall near
Hurricane Katrina made its
first landfall as a Category 1 hurricane on August 25 near
Hurricane Ophelia brushed by the Outer Banks of North Carolina as a Category 1 hurricane. Although the eye of the storm did not pass over land, the system buffeted the Outer Banks with hurricane-force winds for several hours, and there was considerable damage in several coastal counties. Estimates of insured damage from the system are approximately $800 million dollars. There were no direct deaths reported from the system.
Hurricane Rita brushed by
the
2
Predictions
of Individual Monthly Atlantic TC Activity
Our
An aspect of our climate research besides our seasonal forecasts is the development of TC activity predictions for individual months. On average, August, September and October have about 26%, 48%, and 18% or 92% of the total Atlantic basin NTC activity. Initial August-only forecasts have now been made for the last six seasons. September-only forecasts have now been made for the last four seasons, and October-only forecasts have now been made for the last three seasons.
There are often monthly periods within active and inactive hurricane seasons which do not conform to the overall season. To this end, we have recently developed new schemes to forecast August-only, September-only and October-only Atlantic basin hurricane activity by the beginning of each respective month. These efforts have recently been documented in papers by Blake and Gray (2004) for our August-only forecast and by Klotzbach and Gray (2003) for our September-only forecast – see the references at the end.
Quite skillful August-only, September-only and October-only prediction schemes have been developed based on 51 years (1950-2000) of hindcast testing using a statistically independent jackknife approach. Predictors are derived from prior month, usually June and July NCEP global reanalysis data for all three (August-only, September-only and October-only) individual monthly forecasts and include August’s data for the early September update of the September-only and October-only forecasts. September data is included for the early October update of the October-only forecast. Table 2 gives an outline and timetable of the different forecasts and the verifications we issue after the end of each month.
2.1 Independent October-only Statistical
Forecast
Through examination of the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis, we have discovered five predictors that in combination explain about 60% of the October cross-validated variance in Net Tropical Cyclone (NTC) activity for the hindcast period 1950-2001. We are currently unable to find combinations of predictors that explain large amounts of variance for the individual tropical cyclone parameters (i.e., named storms, hurricane days, etc.). Therefore, our October forecast consists of predicting NTC and consequently increasing or decreasing October’s values for the other parameters accordingly. For example, if October NTC was 150 percent of normal, and a typical October had two named storms, we would forecast three named storms for October.
Table 3 lists the five October-only predictors with their location and sign for enhanced TC activity, and Figure 2 displays these predictors on a map.
Table 4 lists the value of each
October-only predictor and whether its 2005 value indicates above or
below-average October-only TC activity.
Table 2: Timetable of the issuing of our after-July monthly forecasts (in early August, in early September, and early October), the times of their verification, and the dates of seasonal updates. Note that we make three separate October-only forecasts; two separate September-only forecasts, and one separate August-only forecast. Seasonal updates are issued in early September and early October.
|
Times of Forecast |
Based on Data Through |
|
Forecasts |
|
|
|
Early August |
July |
August Forecast |
September Forecast |
October Forecast |
Full Season Forecast |
|
Early September |
August |
August Verification |
September Forecast |
October Forecast |
Remainder of Season
Forecast |
|
Early October |
September |
|
September Verification |
October Forecast |
Remainder of Season
Forecast |
Table 3: Meteorological predictor and its location for the October-only forecast. A plus (+) means that positive values are associated with increased hurricane activity, and a minus (-) indicates that negative values of the predictor are associated with increased hurricane activity.
|
Name of Predictor |
Location |
|
1) July-August SLP (-) |
(12.5-27.5ºN, 15-45ºW) |
|
2) July-August 200 mb U (+) |
(35-47.5ºS, 160ºE-155ºW) |
|
3) Previous November SLP (-) |
(45-65ºN, 115-145ºW) |
|
4) August SST (+) |
(22.5-35ºN, 120-150ºE) |
|
5) September 200 mb U (+) |
(37.5-47.5ºS, 0-30ºW) |

Figure 2: Predictors utilized for the October-only forecast which employs meteorological data through September. Numbers of each area are keyed to the predictor description given in Table 3.
Table 4: Values of meteorological parameters for the October-only forecast.
|
Name of Predictor |
Parameter Values in Standard Deviations (SD) |
Indication for Above or Below-Average Activity |
|
1) July-August SLP (-) |
+0.2 SD |
Slightly Below |
|
2) July-August 200 mb U (+) |
-0.3 SD |
Slightly Below |
|
3) Previous November SLP (-) |
+0.7 SD |
Below |
|
4) August SST (+) |
+0.8 SD |
Above |
|
5) September 200 MB U (+) |
+0.5 SD |
Above |
Three out of five October predictors are negative. However, two of these predictors are only weakly negative, and our early August forecast for October indicated above-average activity. We also believe that the current favorable conditions are likely to last for the remainder of the 2005 hurricane season. We have kept our October forecast the same as it was in early September. We continue to call for well above-average October activity with an NTC of about 175 percent of the typical October value. In round numbers, we are forecasting 3 named storms, 2 hurricanes, 1 intense hurricane and an NTC of 30 for October.
Table 5 displays a summary of this year’s hurricane activity through September and our projection for the rest of the season. We expect October activity to be above its climatological average. We assume no activity in November.
Table 5: Summary of hurricane activity through September 2005 and projected hurricane activity for the remainder of the year.
|
Tropical Cyclone Parameters
and 1950-2000 Full Season Climatology (in parentheses) |
Observed TC Activity
Through September |
Updated October Forecast |
Updated Full Season Forecast |
|
Named Storms (NS) (9.6) |
17 |
3 |
20 |
|
Named Storm Days (NSD)
(49.1) |
85 |
13 |
100 |
|
Hurricanes (H) (5.9) |
9 |
2 |
11 |
|
Hurricane Days (HD) (24.5) |
35 |
6 |
40 |
|
Intense Hurricanes (IH)
(2.3) |
5 |
1 |
6 |
|
Intense Hurricane Days
(IHD) |
11.75 |
1 |
13 |
|
Net Tropical Cyclone
Activity (NTC) (100%) |
183 |
30 |
215 |
3.
We have recently developed a
methodology for calculating the probability of hurricane landfall along the
entire
Table 6: Estimated probability (expressed in percent) of one or more U.S. landfalling tropical storms (TS), category 1-2 hurricanes (HUR) and category 3-4-5 hurricanes (IH) making landfall along the entire U.S. coast for October 2005 based on an October NTC forecast of 30. The long-term mean October probability of one or more landfalling systems during the last 52 years is given in parentheses.
|
Storm Category |
October 2005 Probability |
|
Named Storm (29%) |
49% |
|
Hurricane (15%) |
21% |
|
Intense Hurricane (6%) |
15% |
4 United
States Major Hurricane Landfall Since 1995
The global climate signals since
1995 have been similar to the global climate signals of the mid-1920s to the
mid-1960s when many more major hurricanes struck the U.S. East Coast and
5 Discussion
The 2005 hurricane season has been a very active one. We expect total storm activity to reach near-record levels by the time the season ends on November 30. June-July 2005 had the most early-season tropical cyclone activity on record (7 named storms, 2 hurricanes, 2 intense hurricanes and an NTC of 68). August and September have also been quite active with the two months accruing an NTC of 115 (compared with the 51-year August-September average of 75). Several factors were responsible for the very active Atlantic season this year. Among these are:
1) Warmer Atlantic sea surface temperatures (SST)
2)
3) Lower vertical wind shear
4) Moister lower and middle atmosphere
As was the case during the 2004
hurricane season, there has tended to be an anomalous ridge along the East
Coast of the
6 United
States Landfalling Hurricane Webpage Application
Over the past four years, we have
been compiling and synthesizing our landfalling hurricane data and have
developed a webpage with extensive landfall probabilities for the Gulf and

Figure 3: July-September
2005 500 mb (~5.5 km) geopotential height anomaly. The high anomalies indicate ridge conditions
which tend to steer tropical cyclones westward across the longitudes of the
Table 7: Data currently available on the CSU landfalling hurricane probability webpage.
|
Storm Category |
Annual Landfall Probability |
Annual Vicinity Probability |
50-Year Probability |
|
NS |
X |
X |
X |
|
H |
X |
X |
X |
|
IH |
X |
X |
X |
Figures 4 and 5 display example screens of data that are available on this website. The user can select tracks of all intense hurricanes that have made landfall in a given area over the last 100 years. This webpage is currently available at http://www.e-transit.org/hurricane. One can also reach this webpage from a link off the CSU tropical meteorology project: http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu.

Figure 4: View of landfalling hurricane webpage centered on Subregion 1E – the Houston/Galveston metropolitan area.

Figure 5: Example of data available from the
7 The
1995-2005 Upswing in Atlantic Major Hurricanes and Global Warming
This year’s major hurricanes Dennis, Katrina and Rita and last year's four U.S. landfalling major hurricanes have spawned an abundance of questions concerning the role that global warming might be playing in these events. The ideas that global warming may have been partly responsible for the last two years of greater landfalling hurricane activity has been enhanced by two recent papers presenting data to show that global tropical cyclones have become more intense in recent years. They speculate that this increased hurricane activity may be due to human-induced global warming. These papers are:
a) Kerry Emanuel, 4 August 2005: Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years. Nature, 436, 686-688.
b) P.J. Webster, G.J. Holland, J. Currie and P. Chang, 16 September 2005: Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science, 309, 1844-1846.
The first author’s comments concerning some of the flaws in the data sets that these papers used will be sent to the respective journals and will be put in the 2005 seasonal verification paper in a summarized form.
These papers’ implications that a Power Dissipation Index (PDI) (related to tropical cyclone intensity) has increased markedly in the Northwest Pacific and Atlantic over the last 30 years (Emanuel) and that global Category 4-5 tropical cyclone activity has gone up over the last 15 years (Webster et al.) from the prior 15 years are likely not valid. Several factors need to be considered when evaluating these papers:
1) The SSTs of the ocean basins where TCs form have warmed very little in the last 30 years (~0.2-0.3oC). This warming is less than the 30 year warming of the whole globe. Ocean temperature change has been matched by upper tropospheric warming. Lapse rates and rainfall in the various tropical cyclone basins have shown no significant change. We have no theory to relate TC basin SST variation to hurricane frequency and intensity when SST variations are so small.
2) The
3) There are special difficulties in using the NW Pacific data sets during the years of 1973-1986 when the Atkinson-Holliday (1977) wind pressure scheme was employed. This is now well-accepted to have given typhoon maximum wind speeds that were much too low. Much of the increase in a hurricane’s maximum winds from this period to the present is not real but due to erroneous wind under-estimates during the earlier period.
4) Major (Cat. 3-4-5) hurricane activity in the Northeast Pacific has gone down during the last two 15-year periods from 80 (1975-1989) to 74 (1990-2004), but the Webster et al. paper shows an increase in Category 4-5 tropical cyclones from 36 to 49. This requires that Category 3 tropical cyclones decreased from 44 during 1975-1989 to 25 during 1990-2004. This is highly unlikely. SSTs in the NE Pacific increased by only 0.1oC between these two periods.
5) Satellite technology and user training experience in the Southern Hemisphere in the period of 1975-1989 was not adequate to be able to make the fine distinction between a Category 4-5 hurricane and a Category 3 hurricane or the distinction of a storm with sustained surface winds above or below 130 mph. The Webster et al. paper states that Southern Hemisphere Category 4-5 hurricanes increased from 33 to 72 from 1975-1989 to 1990-2004. This requires that Category 3 hurricane increased from only 42 to 48 during the same period. This is not physically plausible. It is also not physically possible that Southern Hemisphere major (Cat. 3-4-5) hurricanes nearly doubled from 75 to 130 from 1975-1989 to 1990-2004. Physical features present during the last 15 years were not that different from the prior 15 years.
SUMMARY
We believe that there is likely little or no relationship between the small observed warming of the globe over the past thirty years and changes in global tropical cyclone activity or intensity.
8 Forecast
Theory and Cautionary Note
Our forecasts are based on the
premise that those global oceanic and atmospheric conditions which preceded
comparatively active or inactive hurricane seasons in the past provide
meaningful information about similar trends in future seasons. It is important that the reader appreciate
that these seasonal forecasts are based on statistical schemes, which, owing to
their intrinsically probabilistic nature, will fail in some years. Moreover, these forecasts do not specifically
predict where within the Atlantic basin these storms will strike. The probability of landfall for any one
location along the coast is very low and reflects the fact that, in any one
season, most
9 Forthcoming
2005 Hurricane Activity Verification and Upcoming Forecasts
We will be issuing our forecast verification for the 2005 Atlantic basin hurricane season on Friday, November 18. The first forecast for the 2006 hurricane season will be issued on Tuesday, December 6. All forecasts are available on our website at: http://hurricane.atmos.colostate.edu/Forecasts.
10 Acknowledgments
Besides the individuals named on page 2, there have been a number of other meteorologists that have furnished us with data and given valuable assessments of the current state of global atmospheric and oceanic conditions. These include Arthur Douglas, Richard Larsen, Todd Kimberlain, Ray Zehr, and Mark DeMaria. In addition, Barbara Brumit and Amie Hedstrom have provided excellent manuscript, graphical and data analysis and assistance over a number of years. We have profited over the years from many in-depth discussions with most of the current and past NHC hurricane forecasters. The first author would further like to acknowledge the encouragement he has received for this type of forecasting research application from Neil Frank, Robert Sheets, Robert Burpee, Jerry Jarrell, former directors of the National Hurricane Center (NHC), and from the current director, Max Mayfield and their forecast staffs. Uma Shama and Larry Harman of Bridgewater State College, MA have provided assistance and technical support in the development of our Landfalling Hurricane Probability Webpage. We also thank Bill Bailey of the Insurance Information Institute for his sage advice and encouragement.
The financial backing for the issuing and verification of these forecasts has in part been supported by the National Science Foundation and by the Research Foundation of Lexington Insurance Company (a member of the American International Group). We also thank the GeoGraphics Laboratory at Bridgewater State College for their assistance in developing the Landfalling Hurricane Probability Webpage.
11 Citations
and Additional
12 Verification
of Previous Forecasts
Table 8: Summary verification of the authors’ six
previous years of seasonal forecasts for Atlantic TC activity between
1999-2004. Verification of our earlier
year forecasts for the years 1984-1998 are given in our late November seasonal
verifications (on this web location).
|
1999 |
5 Dec. 1998 |
Update 7 April |
Update 4 June |
Update 6 August |
Obs. |
|
No. of Hurricanes |
9 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
|
No. of Named Storms |
14 |
14 |
14 |
14 |
12 |
|
No. of Hurricane Days |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
43 |
|
No. of Named Storm Days |
65 |
65 |
75 |
75 |
77 |
|
Hurr. Destruction Potential |
130 |
130 |
130 |
130 |
143 |
|
Intense Hurricanes |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
|
Intense Hurricane Days |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
15 |
|
Net Tropical Cyclone
Activity |
160 |
160 |
160 |
160 |
193 |
|
2000 |
8 Dec. 1999 |
Update 7 April |
Update 7 June |
Update 4 August |
Obs. |
|
No. of Hurricanes |
7 |
7 |
8 |
7 |
8 |
|
No. of Named Storms |
11 |
11 |
12 |
11 |
14 |
|
No. of Hurricane Days |
25 |
25 |
35 |
30 |
32 |
|
No. of Named Storm Days |
55 |
55 |
65 |
55 |
66 |
|
Hurr. Destruction Potential |
85 |
85 |
100 |
90 |
85 |
|
Intense Hurricanes |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
|
Intense Hurricane Days |
6 |
6 |
8 |
6 |
5.25 |
|
Net Tropical Cyclone
Activity |
125 |
125 |
160 |
130 |
134 |
|
2001 |
7 Dec. 2000 |
Update 6 April |
Update 7 June |
Update 7 August |
Obs. |
|
No. of Hurricanes |
5 |
6 |
7 |
7 |
9 |
|
No. of Named Storms |
9 |
10 |
12 |
12 |
15 |
|
No. of Hurricane Days |
20 |
25 |
30 |
30 |
27 |
|
No. of Named Storm Days |
45 |
50 |
60 |
60 |
63 |
|
Hurr. Destruction Potential |
65 |
65 |
75 |
75 |
71 |
|
Intense Hurricanes |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
|
Intense Hurricane Days |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
Net Tropical Cyclone
Activity |
90 |
100 |
120 |
120 |
142 |
|
2002 |
7 Dec. 2001 |
Update 5 April |
Update 31 May |
Update 7 August |
Update 2 Sept. |
Obs. |
|
No. of Hurricanes |
8 |
7 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
|
No. of Named Storms |
13 |
12 |
11 |
9 |
8 |
12 |
|
No. of Hurricane Days |
35 |
30 |
25 |
12 |
10 |
11 |
|
No. of Named Storm Days |
70 |
65 |
55 |
35 |
25 |
54 |
|
Hurr. Destruction Potential |
90 |
85 |
75 |
35 |
25 |
31 |
|
Intense Hurricanes |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
Intense Hurricane Days |
7 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
2.5 |
|
Net Tropical Cyclone
Activity |
140 |
125 |
100 |
60 |
45 |
80 |
|
2003 |
6 Dec. 2002 |
Update 4 April |
Update 30 May |
Update 6 August |
Update 3 Sept. |
Update 2 Oct. |
Obs. |
|
No. of Hurricanes |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
7 |
8 |
7 |
|
No. of Named Storms |
12 |
12 |
14 |
14 |
14 |
14 |
14 |
|
No. of Hurricane Days |
35 |
35 |
35 |
25 |
25 |
35 |
32 |
|
No. of Named Storm Days |
65 |
65 |
70 |
60 |
55 |
70 |
71 |
|
Hurr. Destruction Potential |
100 |
100 |
100 |
80 |
80 |
125 |
129 |
|
Intense Hurricanes |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
Intense Hurricane Days |
8 |
8 |
8 |
5 |
9 |
15 |
17 |
|
Net Tropical Cyclone
Activity |
140 |
140 |
145 |
120 |
130 |
155 |
173 |
|
2004 |
5 Dec. 2003 |
Update 2 April |
Update 28 May |
Update 6 August |
Update 3 Sept. |
Update 1 Oct. |
Obs. |
|
No. of Hurricanes |
7 |
8 |
8 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
9 |
|
No. of Named Storms |
13 |
14 |
14 |
13 |
16 |
15 |
14 |
|
No. of Hurricane Days |
30 |
35 |
35 |
30 |
40 |
52 |
46 |
|
No. of Named Storm Days |
55 |
60 |
60 |
55 |
70 |
96 |
90 |
|
Intense Hurricanes |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
|
Intense Hurricane Days |
6 |
8 |
8 |
6 |
15 |
23 |
22 |
|
Net Tropical Cyclone
Activity |
125 |
145 |
145 |
125 |
185 |
240 |
229 |